last term, the spreerm court had the united states versus jones case involving tracking devices. i'm not sure anyone under 40 views tracking devices as new technology, but by supreme court standards they qualified, and there's at least one case potentially on the horizon that involves a new technology, but in terms of the fourth amendment cases that are already on the court's dockets, i think it's fair to say that often involves old technology, and i guess i promised that i would slip in at least one k-9 jokes, but this is the year the supreme court goes to the dogs. they have no fewer than two cases involving the application of the fourth amendment to dog snuff, and perhaps intentional or or unintentional act of humor, they set both cases for oral argument on halloween. the court is going to have kind of a fourth amendment day on halloween with these two cases involving dogs, and a further familiarity, is the two cases actually come from the state of florida, both from the florida supreme court, and so the state of florida's actually the petitioner in both of the cases that the